|



.htm_cmp_axis110_vbtn.gif)


















| |
99mTc-Tetrofosmin Scintigraphy in Lung Cancer
Staging and Follow-up Evaluations
Gianfranco Buccheri, M.D.; Alberto Biggi, M.D.; Domenico Ferrigno, M.D. and Antonella
Francini, M.D.
* From the Lung Unit (Drs.
Buccheri and Ferrigno), and the Service of Nuclear Medicine (Drs. Biggi and
Francini) of the A. Carle and S. Croce Hospitals ("Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e
Carle"), I-12100 Cuneo, Italy.
KEY WORDS: Lung cancer, staging assessment, treatment response evaluation, computed
tomography, 99mTc-tetrofosmin scintigraphy.
Reprint requests and communications regarding the manuscript: Gianfranco Buccheri, MD, Via Repubblica 10/c, I-12018 Roccavione (CN), Italy, Tel.: +39.0171.441733 or +39.0171.441777, Fax: +39.0171.611597 or +39.0171.441764, Email: buccheri@culcasg.org
The Authors have no financial interest in the subject discussed
in this paper. They all have sufficiently participated in the work and in the manuscript
preparation. The local committee on human research approved this study.
ABSTRACT
Study Objectives 99mTc-tetrofosmin has recently
emerged as a new radiopharmaceutical for cancer visualization. In this study, we
investigate its ability to assess lung cancer dissemination and progression.
Design Prospective study. A 99mTc-tetrofosmin
scan was incorporated into the pretreatment and posttreatment diagnostic workup of lung
cancer in the years 1998 and 1999.
Setting Second referral institution for a province of
500,000 inhabitants.
Patients Sixty-one patients, strongly suspected of lung
cancer, were photoscanned; 21 of them were re-scanned after completion of their front line
treatment. Eleven patients were eventually operated upon, and 3 others underwent
mediastinoscopy.
Interventions Both planar and SPECT thoracic views were obtained.
Images for the whole body were also acquired.
Results All 57 patients whose lung cancer was
pathologically confirmed showed accumulation of the radiotracer (100% sensitivity).
However, three of the 4 non-malignant lesions were also 99mTc-tetrofosmin
positive. 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan was highly sensitive for the detection of the
T0-T2 disease (97% sensitivity), and highly specific for the N0-N1 disease (83%
specificity). In the 16 pathologically staged mediastina, sensitivity, specificity and
accuracy rates were 73%, 100%, and 81%, respectively. 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan
correctly detected most skeleton (9 of 10) and brain (5 of 7) metastases. The treatment
response evaluation made with 99mTc-tetrofosmin corresponded to the clinical
estimate in almost half of the sample.
Conclusions This study shows that 99mTc-tetrofosmin
scan is a relatively accurate method for lung cancer evaluation. Our preliminary data
excludes, however, that noninvasive diagnostic efficiency might be dramatically increased
by a scintigraphy with 99mTc-tetrofosmin. More studies are needed for a better
understanding of the real value of this technique.
LIST OF ABBREVIATION:
SPECT: single photo emission computed tomography
PET: positron emission tomography
CT: computed tomography
ATS: American Thoracic Society
ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status
INTRODUCTION
In lung cancer, like in any other human cancer, the techniques of Nuclear
Medicine are based on different radiopharmaceuticals, capable of exploiting specific
characteristics of the malignant cells 1. Radiopharmaceuticals may recognize
diverse cell densities, growth rates, metabolic pathways, and antigenic or surface
receptor expressions 1. It is generally admitted that both 57mCo-bleomycin and 67mGa scintigraphy are tumor sensitive and
moderately accurate, but their use has been forsaken by more innovative and encouraging
approaches 2. A list of the newer radiopharmaceuticals being tested include
non-specific radio-tracers (201mTl
and 99mTc-MIBI), substances
useful in particular clinical applications (the somatostatin analogues 123mI-tyr3 and the 111mIn octreotide for neuronendocrine
tumors), radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies, and the recently introduced positron emission
tomography (PET scan) 2; 3. With the possible exception of PET scan, the
results obtained so far, albeit stimulating and in same case attractive, remain
preliminary 4.
Tetrofosmin is a lipophilic, cationic diphosphine, initially developed for
myocardial imaging 5. Like other myocardial perfusion agents 2, 99mTc-tetrofosmin accumulates in
lung cancer 6-11, but there is virtually no information concerning important
clinical applications, such as lung cancer staging and treatment response evaluation.
With the current study, we aimed to compensate that lack of information. In
particular, we were interested in 99mTc-tetrofosmin
scan ability to detect primary and metastatic cancer deposits and to recognize their
changes in response to treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHO DS
Patients and Study Design
Sixty new unselected patients, who were evaluated for surgical cure of a
highly suspected lung cancer, were set as a minimum target sample for this study. This
figure was achieved in less than 2 years (March 27, 1998-August 20, 1999). Eligible
patients either had histologically proved lung cancer, or had undergone thoracotomy for a
clinical diagnosis of lung cancer. All had been considered operable after a preliminary
evaluation based on clinical history and physical examination, blood chemistry and
hematological counts, bronchoscopy, functional respiratory tests, chest x-rays and any
other examination required by the results of the basic staging work-up. All registered
patients underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan (both planar and single
photo-emission computed tomography [SPECT] images), 99mTc-methilene
diphosphonate bone scan, and computed tomography (CT) of the thorax, abdomen, and brain.
Other imaging studies, such as bone radiograms and ultrasonographic studies of the
abdomen, were performed to support diagnosis or to guide needle aspirations and biopsies.
All staging tests were obtained within a 3-week period. Tumor cell type and stage of
disease were classified according to internationally adopted criteria 12; 13.
We obtained follow-up clinical reassessments at 3- to 4-week intervals during
chemotherapy, and every three to six weeks in case of palliation radiotherapy, or no
active anticancer treatment. Patients treated with radical surgery were seen at longer
intervals, ranging three to six months. In 21 patients, a complete re-staging evaluation
was obtained three months after the first initial evaluation. Such re-staging evaluation
included all the examinations performed at diagnosis (including the scintigraphy), along
any other test as clinically indicated. At each follow-up re-assessment, the status of
disease was classified using the standard criteria of objective response 14. To
account for any meaningful variation in tumor volume, we interposed a category of minor
regression between partial response and stable disease. Minor regression was defined as
any unequivocal tumor volume shrinkage that did not fulfill the criteria of partial
regression.
Patients were informed of the nature, aim, potential risks and benefits of both 99mTc-tetrofosmin
scan and iodine-contrasted CT scan, and gave their consent before entering the study. The
local committee on human research approved this study. Anthropometric and clinical
characteristics of the 61 registered and assessable patients are summarized in Table 1.
99m Tc-tetrofosmin
scan: Radio pharmaceutical, Imaging and Interpretation of the Images
Tetrofosmin was obtained commercially (Mioview Kit, Nycomed Sorin Amersham,
Milan, Italy). The labeling and quality control procedures were performed according to the
manufacturers instruction. The radiochemical purity of 99mTc-tetrofosmin used in this
study was consistently higher than 90%.
The subjects received 11.1 MBq/kg of 99mTc-tetrofosmin.
Planar spot images were acquired by a large field of view gamma camera (GE 400 ACT,
General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) fitted with a medium-low-energy high resolution
parallel-hole collimator. Planar images (5 minutes per images,128*128 matrix) of the chest
(anterior and posterior) were acquired 5, 20, 60 and 120 after
injection in order to clinically validate the multidrug resistance hypothesis (data not
reported in this article). SPECT views of the thorax were obtained 30 after
injection and SPECT views of the brain were obtained 60 after injection. In both
cases, sixty-four planar images were collected around 360° with a 64*64 word-mode matrix.
SPECT images were used for staging purposes and for comparison with CT. The acquisition
time for each plane was 20 sec. The 64 planar projections were reconstructed to transverse
slices with the use of a Butterworth filter (cut-off frequencies= 0.4 cycles/cm, power
factor=20) at a 2-pixel thickness for each transverse (12.8 mm thick) slice. No
attenuation correction was used. Transverse sections were reoriented into the sagittal and
coronal planes.
SPECT images of the chest or brain were regarded as positive when an abnormal 99mTc-tetrofosmin uptake that
exceeded pulmonary or brain background was documented in at least two sequential planes
(either transverse, or sagittal, or coronal). The abnormality was located into a
pulmonary, hilar, or mediastinal region according to topographic criteria. Pulmonary
uptakes adjacent to the chest wall were read as T3, while accumulations involving the
mediastinal space were classified as T4 lesions. Mediastinal lesions were assigned to a
definite nodal station according to topographic criteria and the American Thoracic Society
(ATS) node-mapping scheme 15.
The data were visually evaluated by two experienced Nuclear Medicine Physicians
(A.B. and A.F.) with knowledge of the CT results and blinded to the pathological findings,
according to the above definitions and the 1997 Revision of the International Staging
System13.
Regions of interest were localized in the tumor mass and normal lung, both on
planar (20 and 120 images) and SPECT images. From them, the tumor-to-normal
lung ratio was obtained.
Thoracic CT : technique and reading
All patients included in this report were studied with a CT of the thorax, upper
abdomen and brain. Until October 1998, CT scans were performed on a conventional scanner
(GE 9800, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA); then, a spiral-CT machine (CT twin flash,
Elscint Ltd., Haifa, Israel) was used. Ten millimeter-thick sections of the thorax were
obtained at 1-cm intervals, during suspended inspiration, from the lung apices to the
upper abdomen. In selected cases, five mm-thick sections at five mm-intervals were
acquired through the region of interest. Iodinated intravenous contrast (150 c3
bolus, plus 100 c3 in slow infusion) was injected prior to all studies.
Appropriate windows were used for viewing both lungs and soft tissues.
Mediastinal nodes were labeled as abnormal if they were 1 cm or larger (short
axis) and/or 1.5 cm or longer (long axis) on the transverse plan images. Enlarged
mediastinal lymph nodes were ascribed to a definite nodal station on the basis of the ATS
classification 15. All CT scans were interpreted by two experienced
radiologists (D.G., P.V.), with no restriction to the clinical information available at
the time of the exam.
Surgical Sampling and Pathologic Examination
In patients who underwent surgery, nodal stations positive to either CT or
SPECT were carefully inspected and sampled, even when lymph nodes appeared macroscopically
normal. All enlarged, palpable or visible nodes were removed in their integrity. In
apparently normal mediastina with negative preoperative studies, a minimum sampling of 3
node stations was required to reject the hypothesis of N2 disease. Mediastinoscopies (and,
in one case, left anterior mediastinotomy) were performed when CT or scintigraphy were
positive for accessible lymph nodes in otherwise operable patients. Removed lymph nodes
were fixed separately in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and labeled according to the ATS
criteria 15.
Statistical Analysis
All 99mTc-tetrofosmin scans (SPECT results) were designated true
positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative for the T and N factor, using
either the best clinical estimate, or the pathological reference when available. In
pathologically staged patients, also CT scan results were reviewed and labeled as true
positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative. Values of sensitivity,
specificity, accuracy, and predictive capabilities were calculated according to the
formulas given by Galen 16. Proportions are presented along with their 95%
confidence interval 17.
RESULTS
Characteristics
of Patients
Sixty-one patients (11 females and 50 males) were registered onto this study
and assessable. Of them, 27 had a lung tumor located peripherally in the lung parenchyma
(tumor growth beyond the lobar bronchi or non-visible at bronchoscopy), 30 had a central
lesion. The final diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma (21 patients), small cell cancer
(8), adenocarcinoma (18), large cell anaplastic carcinoma (5), undefined cell type or
mixed histology lung cancer (5), non-malignant lung lesion (4, including 1 sclerotic
bronchiectasis and 3 radiologically atypical pneumonias). All patients, but 2, had an
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 18 comprised
between 0 and 2. At the end of the pre-treatment staging evaluation, 11 patients were
operated upon, 3 underwent mediastinoscopy, and 2 had cervical exploration of
supraclavicular glands. As a result, 16 patients had a pathologically documented N
classification. There were also 12 T pathologic classifications (i.e., the 11 patients
operated upon, plus one patient with a pleural effusion containing malignant cells). Table
1 summarizes the demographic, clinical, pathological, and follow-up data of the 61
patients.
Imaging the Primary Tumor
Table 2 summarizes 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan data, reporting the total
number of acquired planar and SPECT images, the tumor/background ratio and the evaluations
of disease extent and treatment response. In all, we obtained 85 planar and SPECT views
from 64 subjects. However, three patients were photo-scanned only after treatment and
lacked a baseline evaluation. For this reason, they were excluded from study. All lung
cancer patients showed an accumulation of Tetrofosmin in their lesion. As expected,
tumor/background ratio was, on average, higher in SPECT than in planar views, and tended
to be lower after treatment. No difference in tumor/background ratio was evident comparing
early and late planar images.
99mTc-tetrofosmin scan was incorrectly positive in 3 subjects whose
initial diagnosis of lung cancer was excluded at the completion of their diagnostic
process. In these patients, the follow-up observation and the demonstration of a partial
(or complete) resolution of the radiological densities suggested the final diagnosis of
pneumonia. Fig. 1 depicts the increased uptake of 99mTc-tetrofosmin in a
supposed malignant lesion (patient 42) that showed a complete CT clearing after
antibiotics. As already said, 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan was correctly positive in
all 57 lung cancer patients (100% sensitivity). The minimum size of tumor that could be
detected was 1.2*1 cm.
Staging the Intrathoracic Disease
Table 3 put in correlation 99mTc-tetrofosmin findings with either
the best clinical estimate or the pathological diagnosis. In 54% of the cases, 99mTc-tetrofosmin
estimates corresponded to the best clinical assessment (T factor evaluation), which was
underestimated in another 31% of the patients. In the subgroup of 12 patients with a
pathological T assessment, a slightly inferior accuracy rate (42%) and an increased error
of underestimation (50%) were observed. 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT readings were
fairly more accurate in pathologically documented nodal disease (accuracy rate: 69%).
Based on the above data, formulas for the diagnosis of "locally limited
disease" (T1-T2 disease) or "regionally limited disease" (N0-N1) could be
calculated. Table 4 provides the precise estimates and the 95% confidence intervals of
sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictability for the 99mTc-tetrofosmin
scan diagnosis of "limited disease". Calculations are made using both the
clinical and the pathological reference. With limitation to the pathologically documented
cases, a comparison with CT scan, assumed to be the gold standard for pre-surgical
evaluation, is provided. Such a comparison showed an apparently equivalence of the two
techniques (a 9% accuracy advantage of 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan, in assessing the
T factor, was compensated by a 13% disadvantage in the N factor evaluation). Remarkably, 99mTc-tetrofosmin
scan shared with CT a positive predictive value of 100% (diagnosis of N2-disease, Table
4).
Detecting Distant Metastases
Table 5 allows a summary of the 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan diagnostic
capability for the metastatic disease. Before entering into details, it must be remarked
that, given the physiologic distribution of Tetrofosmin, only a few sites of possible
metastatic spread (i.e., brain, lung and the skeleton) were assessable. Table 5 provides
data concerning 27 metastatic patients and another non-metastatic subject, who had an
unconfirmed scintigraphic diagnosis of bone metastasis. In particular, the site(s) of
metastasis, the method(s) used for their confirmation, and the results of 99mTc-tetrofosmin
scan are listed.
Overall, 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan was truly positive, for at least one
metastatic site, in 17 patients and truly negative in another 29 cases; it was falsely
positive in 1 subject and falsely negative in another 9. This means an overall accuracy
rate of 82% and a rewarding specificity of 97%. Fig.2 shows the intense brain accumulation
of 99mTc-tetrofosmin in patient 16.
Assessing the Response to Treatment
Twenty-one patients underwent a fully re-staging evaluation, including a
repetition of 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan three months after starting treatment. In
three of them, the re-staging evaluation followed an apparently radical tumor resection
(two right superior bilobectomies and one left pneumonectomy). In the remaining 18
subjects, the main treatment was chemotherapy with or without thoracic irradiation. Based
on the standard assessment, all surgical subjects were judged disease-free (or complete
responders). In addition, there were other 2 complete, 9 partial, 4 minor responders, and
3 progressing patients in the chemotherapy group. 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan
response assessment (Fig. 3) was identical in 47% of the sample and reasonably similar in
another 38%. It differed markedly in 3 patients, where Tetrofosmin uptake remained
unchanged, while radiological findings were consistent with a dramatic reduction or even a
disappearance of the cancerous lesion. Fig. 4 gives an example of non-concordant diagnosis
of response (i.e., modest 99mTc-tetrofosmin response, with dramatic CT scan
improvement).
DISCUSSION
In lung cancer, surgery remains the
only chance of cure 19. An accurate non-invasive evaluation of the real extent
of disease is the premise for a successful operation 19. Ideally, the
preoperative staging maneuvers should be able to save patients futile surgery,
guaranteeing the surgical cure if this is appropriate. Often, the final evaluation of
resectability depends on invasive staging procedures, such as mediastinoscopy and anterior
mediastinotomy 19; 20. A reliable non-invasive test might be useful in limiting
the recourse to these procedures, by selecting subgroups of patients with various
probabilities of mediastinal involvement. CT scan is normally used in this context 21.
A classic meta-analytic review of 42 early studies documented, on average, a CT accuracy
rate of 80% 22. Recent estimates suggest more prudent figures, in the 50-60%
range in USA and in the 60-70% range in Europe and Japan 23; 24. According to
these last data, thoracic CT might be insufficiently accurate for being the ideal
preoperative staging test.
Nuclear Medicine continues to introduce novel techniques for cancer imaging. New
scintigraphic methods have been introduced for the detection, pretreatment staging work-up
and posttreatment response evaluation of bronchial carcinoma 2. Unfortunately,
no scintigraphic technique has been found sufficiently effective and feasible to replace
the routine use of CT 2. For example, when we studied 67mGa
scintigraphy and, later, the anti-CEA monoclonal antibody scintigraphy, we obtained
results that were often interesting but never really satisfactory 25-32.
99mTc-tetrofosmin is a new myocardial-imaging agent with high affinity for
cancer tissues. The mechanism of tumor uptake for this radiopharmaceutical is not clearly
understood. Hypotheses explicative of the phenomenon include a 99mTc-tetrofosmin
binding to the cytosol of tumor cell, its intracytoplasmatic retention due to a reduced
activity of the 170 kDa P-glycoprotein, or an increased tumor blood flow or capillary
permeability5.
Clinical studies that have confirmed the affinity of 99mTc-tetrofosmin
for lung cancer are already numerous. In 1995, Basoglu and co-workers reported a pilot
study of 5 patients with bronchial carcinoma, in different phases of treatment, four of
which showed a localized tumor uptake of 99mTc-tetrofosmin 33. In
their mature analysis 9, a clear accumulation of the radiotracer was visibly
present in 26 of 34 malignant tumors, but also in 3 of the 11 benign lesions. Of the 26
patients with malignant tumors accumulating 99mTc-tetrofosmin, nine had
repeated imaging 6 to 8 weeks after radio-chemotherapy. In five of the nine, the course of
the 99mTc-tetrofosmin uptake in follow-up imaging was in accordance with the
radiological size of the tumor, used as the criteria of reference for response. Two of the
four remaining subjects showed some degree of inconsistency between changes in 99mTc-tetrofosmin
uptake and radiological size. In another study, Atasever and colleagues imaged 30 patients
with 99mTc-tetrofosmin 7. There were 21 cases of primary lung cancer
(10 squamous cell, 5 small cell, 4 adenocarcinoma and 2 large cell) and 9 benign lung
lesions (4 pneumonia, 3 tuberculosis, 1 infected bronchiectasis and 1 obliterating
bronchiectasis). Of the 21 primary malignant lesions 19 showed a 99mTc-tetrofosmin
accumulation. But, also 4 (44%) of the nine benign lesions (3 cases of pneumonia and the
one case of active tuberculosis) showed an increased uptake. In 1997, Kao and colleagues
studied 49 patients with a single solid lung mass, to determine the capability of 99mTc-tetrofosmin
SPECT to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions 11. In this study,
only 61% of the lung tumors were detected by 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT of the
chest. In addition, 50% of the benign lesions were falsely visualized. Tetrofosmin uptake
was not related to the mass size. The authors concluded that, for differentiating
malignant and benign lesions presenting as a single solid lung mass, 99mTc-tetrofosmin
SPECT of the chest is of little or no value 11. In the study by Takekawa et al.
6, 46 patients with lung cancer were photo scanned after the intravenous
injection of 740 MBq 99mTc- tetrofosmin and 111 MBq 201mT1-chloride.
The authors reported that 99mTc-tetrofosmin visualized 89% of the primary lung
cancers, 96% of which accumulated 201mT1. The difference between 201mTl
and 99mTc-tetrofosmin uptake ratios was significantly greater in squamous cell
carcinomas than in small cell carcinomas (P < 0.01) and tended to be greater in
squamous cell carcinomas than in adenocarcinomas (P = 0.093), indicating that such a
different biological behavior of 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 201mT1 might
provide useful information regarding the histological type 6. In summary, the
current literature indicates that 99mTc-tetrofosmin is accumulated in 60%-90%
of all lung cancers (with possible variation due to the cell type) and in a rough 50 % of
all benign lesions erroneously considered cancer in a first clinical evaluation. Also our
data (100% sensitivity and 25% specificity) underlines the good affinity of 99mTc-tetrofosmin
for both cancerous and non-cancerous lesions of the lung.
Concerning the main scope of this study, almost no information is available. So
far, our investigation is the only organic, sufficiently large, piece of evidence. It has
been shown, with no possibility of doubt, that 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan may be
used effectively in both lung cancer staging and tumor response evaluation. However, the
exact merit of this technique cannot be assessed on the sole basis of this report. The
comparison with CT scan seems to suggest that 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan might be
equivalent to CT in the study of mediastinum. The ability of 99mTc-tetrofosmin
to visualize distant metastases in the brain and the skeleton is also attractive. The fair
correlation between the standard assessment of response and the uptake of 99mTc-tetrofosmin
has been already reported 9 and our study offers confirming evidence.
Unfortunately, surgical maneuvers still remain essential for a correct staging
classification, and the scintigraphy with 99mTc-tetrofosmin does not change the
situation radically. In the lack of better options, we believe that thoracic CT remains
the standard test for pretreatment and posttreatment evaluation of lung cancer. More
information is needed to correctly catalog 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan in the
diagnostic armamentarium for lung cancer.
REFERENCES
1. Abdel-Dayem HM, Scott A,
Macapinlac H, et al. Tracer imaging in lung cancer. Eur.J.Nucl.Med. 1994; 21:57-81.
2. Buccheri G, Ferrigno D, Biggi A. Nuclear medicine imaging in lung cancer: A plenty
of possibilities (Review). Int.J.Oncol. 1997; 10:847-55.
3. Chiti A, Schreiner FAG, Crippa F, et al. Nuclear medicine procedures in lung cancer.
Eur.J.Nucl.Med. 1999; 26:533-55.
4. Coleman RE. PET in lung cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1999; 40:814-20.
5. Salvatori M. Advances in pulmonary nuclear medicine. Rays 1997; 22:51-72.
6. Takekawa H, Tokaoka K, Tsukamoto E, et al. Visualization of lung cancer with
99Tcm-tetrofosmin imaging: a comparison with 201T1. Nucl.Med.Commun. 1997; 18:341-5.
7. Atasever T, Gökcora N, Vural G, et al. Evaluation of malignant and benign lung
lesions with 99Tcm- tetrofosmin. Nucl.Med.Commun.1996; 17:577-82.
8. Matsunari I, Kinuya S, Nishikawa T, et al. Technetium-99m tetrofosmin uptake in lung
cancer: comparison with thallium-201. Ann.Nucl.Med.1996; 10:143-5.
9. Basoglu T, Bernay I, Coskun C, et al. Pulmonary Tc-99m tetrofosmin imaging: clinical
experience with detecting malignant lesions and monitoring response to therapy.
Clin.Nucl.Med.1998; 23:753-7.
10. Arbab AS, Koizumi K, Toyama K, et al. Detection of lung and chest tumours using
99Tcm-tetrofosmin: comparison with 201Tl. Nucl.Med.Commun.1998; 19:657-63.
11. Kao CH, ChangLai SP, Shen YY, et al. Technetium-99m-tetrofosmin SPECT imaging of
lung masses: a negative study. J.Nucl.Med.1997; 38:1015-9.
12. World Health Organization. International histological classification of tumours.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
13. Mountain CF. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer [see
comments]. Chest 1997; 111:1710-7.
14. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment.
Cancer 1981; 47:207-14.
15. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Purposes and Principles of Staging. In: Beahrs
OH, Earl Henson D, Hutter RVP, Myers MH., eds. Manual for Staging of Cancer. Philadelphia:
Lippincott Co., 1988: 3-10.
16. Galen RS. Predictive values of laboratory tests. Am.J.Cardiol. 1975; 36:536-8.
17. Bulpitt CJ. Confidence intervals. Lancet 1987; 1:494-7.
18. Zubrod CG, Scheiderman MA, Frei E, et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of
chemotherapy in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene
thiophosphoramide. J.Chron.Dis. 1960; 11:7-33.
19. Goldstrow P. The practice of cardiothoracic surgeons in the perioperative staging
of non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 1992; 47:1-2.
20. Foster ED, Munro DD, Dobell ARC. Mediastinoscopy: a review of anatomical
relationships and complications (collective review). Ann.Thorac.Surg. 1972; 13:273-86.
21. Unruh H, Chu-Jeng Chu CR. Mediastinal assessment for staging and treatment of
carcinoma of the lung. Ann.Thorac.Surg. 1986; 41:224-9.
22. Dales RE, Strak RM, Raman S. Computed tomography to stage lung cancer. Approaching
a controversy using meta-analysis. Am.Rev.Respir.Dis. 1990; 141:1096-101.
23. Armstrong P. Preoperative computed tomographic scanning for staging lung cancer.
Thorax 1994; 49:941-3.
24. Mori K, Yokoi K, Saito Y, et al. Diagnosis of Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in
Lung Cancer. Jpn.J.Clin.Oncol. 1992; 22:35-40.
25. Buccheri G, Vola F, Ferrigno D, et al. Lack of clinical significance of Gallium-67
uptake in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur.J.Resp.Dis. 1987; 71:356-61.
26. Buccheri G, Vola F, Ferrigno D, et al. Yield of whole body GA-67 scintigraphy in
the staging of lung cancer. Tumori 1989; 75:38-42.
27. Biggi A, Buccheri G, Ferrigno D, et al. Detection of suspected primary lung cancer
by scintigraphy with indium-111-anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibodies (type
FO23C5). J.Nucl.Med. 1991; 32:2064-8.
28. Buccheri G, Biggi A, Ferrigno D, et al. Imaging lung cancer by scintigraphy with
Indium-111 labeled F(ab')2 fragments of the anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal
antibody FO23C5. Cancer 1992; 70:749-59.
29. Buccheri G, Biggi A, Ferrigno D, et al. Anti-CEA immunoscintigraphy might be more
useful than computed tomography in the preoperative thoracic evaluation of lung cancer.
Chest 1993; 104:734-42.
30. Biggi A, Buccheri G, Ferrigno D, et al. Immunoscintigraphy using monoclonal
antibodies in primary lung cancer. In: AnonymousClinical applications of radiolabelled
monoclonal antibodies in oncology. Wichtig Editore srl: Milan, 1994: 61-96.
31. Buccheri G, Biggi A, Ferrigno D, et al. Anti-CEA immunoscintigraphy and computed
tomographic scanning in the preoperative evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung
cancer. Thorax 1996; 51:359-63.
32. Buccheri G, Biggi A, Ferrigno D. Anti-CEA immunoscintigraphy in the mediastinal
node preoperative assessment of lung cancer. In: Antypas G., ed. Proceedings at 3rd
International Congress on Lung Cancer. Rhodes, 31October-4 November, 1998. Bologna:
Monduzzi Editore, 1998: 43-9.
33. Basoglu T, Sahin M, Coskun C, et al. Technetium-99m-tetrofosmin uptake in malignant
lung tumours. Eur.J.Nucl.Med.1995; 22:687-9.
FIGURE LEGENDS (we apoligize for the lack of
the images on this on-line version of the manuscript)
Figure 1. Transaxial, coronal and sagittal images of the
thorax (patient 42) generated from SPECT and obtained 30 minutes after injection. Note the
intense, inhomogeneous uptake of 99mTc-tetrofosmin into the right lung and the
focal uptake into a mediastinal node. The lesion, initially supposed malignant, was
eventually shown to be benign (radiologically atypical pneumonia), on the basis of a
strict clinical and radiological follow-up.
Figure 2. Transaxial, coronal and sagittal images of the brain
(patient 16) generated from SPECT and obtained 60 minutes after injection. The arrows
indicate the focal uptake of 99mTc-tetrofosmin in a lesion located into the
right occipital lobe. Note the "normal" uptake of the tracer into the choroid
plexuses.
Figure 3. Percentage of agreement, mild disagreement, and
complete disagreement between 99mTc-tetrofosmin scan estimates and the standard
evaluation of treatment response.

Figure 4 (a-b). Pre-treatment (2/15/99) and post-treatment
(6/4/99) transaxial, coronal and sagittal SPECT images of the thorax (Figure 4a). The
arrows indicate the abnormal uptake of the hilar (bilaterally) and mediastinal nodes.
Corresponding CT images are given for comparison (Figure 4b). After chemotherapy (3 cycles
with cisplatin and etoposide), the nodal uptake is almost unchanged, while a marked
reduction of the mediastinal disease is evident on CT (patient 24).

| Tab. 1 |
Demographic
and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Cohort |
| |
Characteristic |
no. |
median |
range |
frequency |
Age (yr) |
61 |
66 |
44-82 |
|
Male sex (y/n) |
61 |
|
|
50/11 |
ECOG PS (0/1/2/3) |
61 |
|
|
11/33/15/2 |
Tumor Cell Type
(E/S/A/L/U) * |
57 |
|
|
21/8/18/5/5 |
Tumor Endobronchial
Location (T/M/L/P) |
57 |
|
|
1/10/19/27 |
Maximum Tumor Diameter,
best estimate (cm) |
46 |
5 |
1.2-13 |
|
Stage Classification
(Ia/Ib/IIa/IIb/IIIa/IIIb/IV) |
57 |
|
|
0/7/1/0/10/12/27 |
TNM Best
Estimate (either pathological or clinical) |
T factor (1/2/3/4) |
57 |
|
|
6/25/9/17 |
N factor (0/1/2/3) |
57 |
|
|
17/4/27/9 |
M factor (0/1) |
57 |
|
|
30/27 |
Bone metastases
(y/n) |
57 |
|
|
11/46 |
Lung metastases
(y/n) |
57 |
|
|
10/47 |
Brain metastases
(y/n) |
57 |
|
|
9/48 |
Liver metastases
(y/n) |
57 |
|
|
6/51 |
Adrenal gland
metastases (y/n) |
57 |
|
|
2/55 |
TNM
Pathological Evaluation |
T factor
(0/1/2/3/4) |
12 |
|
|
1/1/6/0/4 |
N factor (0/1/2/3) |
16 |
|
|
9/2/3/2 |
M factor (0/1) |
3 |
|
|
1/2 |
Primary Treatment
(P/C/R/S/O/U) |
57 |
|
|
5/31/6/11/2/2 |
Objective Response
assessment (CR/PR/MR/SD/PD) |
49 |
|
|
10/16/7/7/9 |
* In 4 patients the diagnosis of
malignancy was excluded either pathologically (1 case of sclerotic pleuricy) or clinically
after a minimum followup of 6 months (3 cases of pneumonias). Abbreviations: ECOG PS= Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
performance status; yr= years; y=yes; n=no; Tumor cell type: E= epidermoid -squamous cell
cancer; S= small cell cancer; A= adenocarcinoma; L=large cell anaplastic cancer;
U=undetermined or mixed cell type; Tumor endobronchial location: T=trachea; M=main
bronchus; L=lobar bronchus; P=segmental or more peripheral bronchus; S=surgical resection;
O= other main treatment; U= unknown (2 patients were lost to followup); Objective Response
Category: CR=complete remission or post-operative disease free status; PR=partial
remission; MR=minor regression;SD=stable disease; PD=progressive disease.
Tab. 2 |
| Scintigrafic Data |
| |
Characteristic |
no. |
median |
range |
frequency |
Planar
Scintigraphies, total (D/F) |
85 |
|
|
61/24 |
No. of
Assessable (D/F) * |
82 |
|
|
61/21 |
SPECT,
total (D/F) |
85 |
|
|
61/24 |
No. of
Assessable (D/F) * |
82 |
|
|
61/21 |
Pretreatment
Tumor Background Ratio |
Early planar
views |
58 |
1,31 |
1.01-2.22 |
|
Late planar
views |
58 |
1,31 |
0.96-2.55 |
|
SPECT |
59 |
2,24 |
1.30-5.26 |
|
Posttreatment
Tumor Background Ratio |
Early planar
views |
16 |
1,22 |
1.03-2.10 |
|
Late planar
views |
16 |
1,23 |
1.03-1.89 |
|
SPECT |
20 |
2,09 |
1.25-3.53 |
|
Pretreatment
Evaluation of the Extent of Disease |
Central Uptake
(y/n) |
61 |
|
|
16/45 |
T
factor (0/1/2/3/4) |
61 |
|
|
1/5/44/1/10 |
N
factor (0/1/2/3) |
61 |
|
|
10/10/29/12 |
Lung
metastases (y/n) |
61 |
|
|
5/56 |
Brain
metastases (y/n) |
61 |
|
|
5/56 |
Bone
metastases (y/n) |
61 |
|
|
10/51 |
Posttreatment
Evaluation of the Extent of Disease |
T
factor (0/1/2/3/4) |
21 |
|
|
2/7/10/0/2 |
N
factor (0/1/2/3) |
21 |
|
|
8/3/3/7 |
Assessment
of the Objective Response to Treatment (CR/PR/MR/SD/PD) |
21 |
|
|
2/12/0/6/1 |
* Three subjectes had only a posttreatment
scintigraphy and were unassessable for this study. Abbreviations: D= performed at diagnosis; F= performed
during the follow-up; y=yes; n=no; SPECT= single photo emission computed tomography;
Objective Response Category: CR=complete remission or post-operative disease free status;
PR=partial remission; MR=minor regression;SD=stable disease; PD=progressive disease.
| Tab. 3 |
Cross-tabulation
between SPECT estimates and the final diagnosis * |
| |
| |
T factor, final diagnosis |
|
N factor, final diagnosis |
| T
factor
SPECT |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
TOTAL |
N
factor,
SPECT |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
TOTAL |
0 |
1 (1) |
|
|
|
|
1 (1) |
0 |
9 (6) |
|
1 |
|
10 (6) |
1 |
|
2 |
3 (2) |
|
|
5 (2) |
1 |
3 (1) |
2 (1) |
5 |
|
10 (2) |
2 |
3 |
4 (1) |
21 (4) |
8 |
8 (4) |
44 (9) |
2 |
8 (2) |
2 (1) |
15 (2) |
4 |
29 (5) |
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
6 (1) |
5 (2) |
12 (3) |
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
9 |
10 |
TOTAL |
21 (9) |
4 (2) |
27 (3) |
9 (2) |
61 (16) |
TOTAL |
4 (1) |
6 (1) |
25 (6) |
9 |
17 (4) |
61 (12) |
|
* The final diagnosis was based on either
clinical or pathological assessment (in brackets the cases with a pathological reference).
Abbreviations: SPECT= single photo emission computed tomography
(Technectium-99m-Tetrofosmin Scintigraphy).
Tab.
4 |
| Tumor Resectability: Diagnostic Formulas |
SCINTIGRAPHIC RESULTS (clinico-pathological reference) |
Diagnosis of limited
disease |
TP |
TN |
FP |
FN |
total |
SE |
SE (CI) |
SP |
SP (CI) |
AC |
AC (CI) |
PPV |
NPV |
T0-T2 (any
reference) |
34 |
10 |
16 |
1 |
61 |
97% |
92% |
103% |
38% |
20% |
57% |
72% |
61% |
83% |
68% |
91% |
N0-N1 (any
reference) |
14 |
30 |
6 |
11 |
61 |
56% |
37% |
75% |
83% |
71% |
96% |
72% |
61% |
83% |
70% |
73% |
SCINTIGRAPHIC RESULTS vs. CT FINDINGS (pathological reference) |
Diagnosis of locally
limited disease (pathological T0-T2 ) |
TP |
TN |
FP |
FN |
total |
SE |
SE (CI) |
SP |
SP (CI) |
AC |
AC (CI) |
PPV |
NPV |
Scintigraphy |
8 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
67% |
40% |
93% |
67% |
IC |
CT-scanning |
7 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
12 |
88% |
65% |
110% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
58% |
30% |
86% |
64% |
0% |
Diagnosis of
regionally limited disease (pathological N0-N1) |
TP | |